Internet Plagiarism Essay - 2,365 words

Internet Plagiarism Internet plagiarism among college students: Journal of College Student Development, May/Jun 2002 by Scanlon, Patrick M, Neumann, David R. Patrick Scanlon and David Neumann have produced a study of internet plagiarism based on surveying a limited number of undergraduates from a limited number of universities in the United States. According to Scanlon and Neumann, six hundred ninety-eight undergraduates from nine colleges and universities were asked to complete a survey on Internet plagiarism. However, as we read the article on Internet Plagiarism, it becomes apparent that the students were NOT asked to complete a survey on Internet plagiarism. They were not even asked to complete a survey on plagiarism. The survey itself had a dual purpose, to investigate plagiarism and communications.


In Scanlons own words, in this survey students were asked about specific acts. In fact, the word plagiarism appeared in none of the items on the survey. (Scanlon and Neumann 2002). Scanlon relates that four years before his article was published (which would be in 1998), there were approximately 70 paper mills on the Web offering term papers (Basinger & McCollum, 1997). Coastal Carolina University, however, estimated that there were only 50 sites online in 1999 (Fain 1999). Groark, Oblinger, and Choa believe that there were 28 sites online in 1997 but 70 were available by early 1998 (Groark, Oblinger, Choa 2001). In 2001, Chillcoat reported that the yahoo search engine listed over 1300 online term paper sites (Chillcoat 2001). One wonders what conclusion can be reached from this wide variety of estimation. The obvious conclusion is that the facts are in dispute.


Disputable facts, therefore, are not true facts. During the article, Scanlon states that One further indication of growing concern over Internet plagiarism is the development of plagiarism-detection software, such as that employed by Turnitin.com. In reality, there is no proof whatsoever that an indication of concern is the development of plagiarism detection software. It is quite possible that the proliferation of plagiarism detection software is a result of an aggressive marketing promotion by an industry that developed as a natural outgrowth of term paper mills. It is also possible that plagiarism detection software evolved as a result of students who wished to be sure their own papers were free of plagiarism before submitting them. A multitude of plagiarism detection software programs and sites now exist, and are available to universities, high schools, and students alike. Since they are available for student use -- and many students DO use this software -- it is likely that some of the popularity of the programs and sites is due to student use. Does the Internet truly exacerbate the long-standing problem of student plagiarism on college campuses? Juner (2006) quotes Laura Choy as stating that "I think students end up plagiarizing unintentionally because they are not properly taught what constitutes plagiarism." Is it possible that plagiarism does not exist, or exists in lower percentages, when staff members take the time to teach? Juner believes that plagiarism is a function of lack of proper training by professors, and states, Much of the plagiarism on college campuses is due to frequent careless use of the Internet.


Students will use several sentences from different internet sources without acknowledging their origin. Even Scanlon admits that the subject has not been adequately studied: Although student academic honesty has attracted considerable scholarly notice for some time, the probable impact of Internet access on student plagiarism is mostly a matter of conjecture and has not yet been studied sufficiently or systematically. Therefore, a measure of the incidence of student online plagiarism will provide a needed map of the territory and an indication of whether or not matters are as bad as many apparently fear they are. (Scanlon and Neumann 2002). It seems unrealistic, then, to announce that the Internet has contributed extensively to the high rise in plagiarism while admitting that the appropriate studies have not been done to prove the point! Given the circumstances one can reasonably question whether plagiarism is deliberate intent to cheat, whether it is lack of education as to what plagiarism is, or whether it is mere carelessness. If the reader recalls, Scanlon pointed out that in his study, the term plagiarism was never used.


Only the acts that Scanlon designated as plagiarism were reviewed. It is possible, therefore, that students did not make the connection between the academic direction do not plagiarize and the actual acts they committed. In such a case, they may not have realized they were plagiarizing. Davis, Grover, Becker, & McGregor (Davis, Grover, Becker, & McGregor 1992) point out that 90% of the students queried will say it is wrong to cheat. It stands to reason, therefore, that students do not realize they are cheating when they commit the acts that Scanlon and Neumann described in their study (but failed to label as plagiarism). Continuing on in that line of thought, Scanlon points out that Aaron (1992) and Nuss (1984) both describe an overall failure of academic institutions to describe what constitutes academic integrity, what defines cheating, and what independent scholarship means (Aaron 1992, Nuss 1984). Overall then we see a failure of the universities and academic organizations to teach, rather than intent of students to cheat.


It is an important distinction. In the section of the study on incidence, Scanlon admits that qualitative review of plagiarism has been conducted primarily within English studies departments. It seems unlikely that studying one subject out of hundreds can give an accurate estimation of plagiarism within an entire arena of academic study. Further, Scanlon even admits that the results are extrapolated from studies, which hardly lends itself to an aura of scientific review (Scanlon and Neumann 2002).. Throughout the study, Scanlon and Neumann make much of the contextual relationship of peer reviews of student plagiarism. They point out that 30% of the students interviewed in a 1963 study by McCabe and Trevino (1996) admitted they were plagiarizing, but that in 1993, only 26% of the students surveyed in the same schools admitted plagiarizing. It is significant that absolutely no supporting information on these studies is given; while McCabe is quoted as stating these variables include perception of peers' behavior, student perceptions of the understanding and acceptance of academic integrity policies, the perceived certainty of being reported for cheating, and the perceived severity of campus penalties for cheating." Scanlon states that Perception of peer behavior is an important factor in academic integrity, but no definition of plagiarizing is given as a baseline, either for the 1963 study or for the 1996 study.


With no definition of plagiarizing, the reader has nothing to base an educated opinion on. Rather, the reader is left to conjecture to figure out what plagiarization is. It is important at this point to take a moment to reflect that the concept and definition of plagiarizing has changed significantly between 1963, and 1996. In point of fact the Internet did not exist in 1963; the entire concept of cut and paste was unknown and, indeed, the technology did not exist to make it possible. Therefore, the de facto definition of plagiarization must have changed significantly over this time period, making it impossible to achieve a direct comparison. Yet, if we are to believe Scanlon and Neumann, McCabe and Trevino, a certain percentage of students adm ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

...................You are reading a preview................... Visit our Blog and Unlock Full Access to this essay

Continue READING the FULL Essay by clicking HERE

Essay Tags: plagiarism, neumann, academic integrity, term paper, academic

This is an Essay sample / Research paper, you can use it for your research of: Internet Plagiarism